<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kiva repayment data</title>
	<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/</link>
	<description>Exploring how to get real change for your dollar.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Elie</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-86031</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-86031</guid>
					<description>James, that's right on both counts (re: independence and re: fungibility).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, that&#8217;s right on both counts (re: independence and re: fungibility).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-86013</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-86013</guid>
					<description>Sorry, I should have said the p-values assume defaults are independent, not delinquencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I should have said the p-values assume defaults are independent, not delinquencies.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-86012</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-86012</guid>
					<description>Thanks, that's an interesting analysis. 

I think the p-values also assume loan delinquincies are independent, and might be too low if that assumption fails, but your general point (that most of the differences are highly unlikely to arise by chance) probably still holds. 

One minor point: my understanding is that Kiva loans made through each field partner are effectively fungible with other loans issued by that partner, not between partners. Is that what you meant to say, or do I have the wrong end of the stick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, that&#8217;s an interesting analysis. </p>
<p>I think the p-values also assume loan delinquincies are independent, and might be too low if that assumption fails, but your general point (that most of the differences are highly unlikely to arise by chance) probably still holds. </p>
<p>One minor point: my understanding is that Kiva loans made through each field partner are effectively fungible with other loans issued by that partner, not between partners. Is that what you meant to say, or do I have the wrong end of the stick?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Elie</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-83755</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-83755</guid>
					<description>Yes, that's essentially the second possibility I listed above, that Kiva partners might prefer to repay a Kiva loan than a regular loan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s essentially the second possibility I listed above, that Kiva partners might prefer to repay a Kiva loan than a regular loan.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-83741</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/10/13/kiva-repayment-data/#comment-83741</guid>
					<description>Is is it possible that since Kiva's borrowers are not the clients but the institutions themselves (who in turn lend to the client and send the client details to Kiva for PR), that Kiva counts the default rates on their loans to institutions rather than the individual borrwers.  My guess is that the Kiva loans are senior unsecured obligations that are repaid from an MFI's entire portfolio - thus individual defaults don't matter to Kiva.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is is it possible that since Kiva&#8217;s borrowers are not the clients but the institutions themselves (who in turn lend to the client and send the client details to Kiva for PR), that Kiva counts the default rates on their loans to institutions rather than the individual borrwers.  My guess is that the Kiva loans are senior unsecured obligations that are repaid from an MFI&#8217;s entire portfolio - thus individual defaults don&#8217;t matter to Kiva.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

