<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Incentives for microfinance charities</title>
	<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/23/incentives-for-microfinance-charities/</link>
	<description>Exploring how to get real change for your dollar.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Holden</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/23/incentives-for-microfinance-charities/#comment-95083</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/23/incentives-for-microfinance-charities/#comment-95083</guid>
					<description>Ben, I see your points as symptoms of the issue I'm describing, that financial measures have gotten a lot more attention than social measures.  I also predict that MIX's collection of social data won't catch up to its collection of financial data anytime soon.

By the way, are you the same Ben who commented &lt;a href="http://blog.givewell.org/?p=484" rel="nofollow"&gt;on behalf of Kiva at our post on LAPO&lt;/a&gt;?  We would be interested in your response to our response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, I see your points as symptoms of the issue I&#8217;m describing, that financial measures have gotten a lot more attention than social measures.  I also predict that MIX&#8217;s collection of social data won&#8217;t catch up to its collection of financial data anytime soon.</p>
<p>By the way, are you the same Ben who commented <a href="http://blog.givewell.org/?p=484" rel="nofollow">on behalf of Kiva at our post on LAPO</a>?  We would be interested in your response to our response.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/23/incentives-for-microfinance-charities/#comment-94962</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/23/incentives-for-microfinance-charities/#comment-94962</guid>
					<description>Two bits of information to color this pretty heavily shaded piece:
- The MIX Market JUST released the social performance reporting tool.  Compliance on it would obviously be lower compared to their annual, consistent process of financial reporting
- Ratings were always intended to be credit rating.  That's why the "social rating" has recently been created and many institutions are receiving one with support from the ADA Rating Fund</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two bits of information to color this pretty heavily shaded piece:<br />
- The MIX Market JUST released the social performance reporting tool.  Compliance on it would obviously be lower compared to their annual, consistent process of financial reporting<br />
- Ratings were always intended to be credit rating.  That&#8217;s why the &#8220;social rating&#8221; has recently been created and many institutions are receiving one with support from the ADA Rating Fund
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doug S.</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/23/incentives-for-microfinance-charities/#comment-94127</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/23/incentives-for-microfinance-charities/#comment-94127</guid>
					<description>Didn't they used to call these kinds of lenders "loan sharks"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t they used to call these kinds of lenders &#8220;loan sharks&#8221;?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

