<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPenn Center for High-Impact Philanthropy</title>
	<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/28/upenn-center-for-high-impact-philanthropy/</link>
	<description>Exploring how to get real change for your dollar.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Phil S.</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/28/upenn-center-for-high-impact-philanthropy/#comment-95120</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/28/upenn-center-for-high-impact-philanthropy/#comment-95120</guid>
					<description>I agree that they do interesting and useful work.

In reading the exec summaries for Malaria and Student Success, I was struck by the diagram that they include at the back.  It's a 3 bubble diagram also available here:

http://www.impact.upenn.edu/our_work/activities.html

(The second chart on that page - purple with 3 intersecting bubbles...)

It suggests that donors use a multi-pronged approach to evaluating charitable opportunities.  Look at the chart for details.  The approach is reasonably similar to what I believe GiveWell is doing, and is expressed clearly and concisely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they do interesting and useful work.</p>
<p>In reading the exec summaries for Malaria and Student Success, I was struck by the diagram that they include at the back.  It&#8217;s a 3 bubble diagram also available here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.impact.upenn.edu/our_work/activities.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.impact.upenn.edu/our_work/activities.html</a></p>
<p>(The second chart on that page - purple with 3 intersecting bubbles&#8230;)</p>
<p>It suggests that donors use a multi-pronged approach to evaluating charitable opportunities.  Look at the chart for details.  The approach is reasonably similar to what I believe GiveWell is doing, and is expressed clearly and concisely.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

