<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trading off upside vs. track record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.givewell.org/2012/01/19/trading-off-upside-vs-track-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2012/01/19/trading-off-upside-vs-track-record/</link>
	<description>Exploring how to get real change for your dollar.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kayla</title>
		<link>http://blog.givewell.org/2012/01/19/trading-off-upside-vs-track-record/comment-page-1/#comment-271964</link>
		<dc:creator>Kayla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.givewell.org/2012/01/19/trading-off-upside-vs-track-record/#comment-271964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s just human nature to assume upside. We all think we have the &#039;next big thing&#039;, we all think it&#039;s possible to win the lottery, we all think our kids are the next prodigy, etc, but when it comes to philanthropy I think it&#039;s much smarter to go with the sure thing instead. Worst case scenario you&#039;re helping somewhere that is truly needed, and best case scenario that &#039;sure thing&#039; becomes something that has much more upside than anticipated.  

I guess I&#039;m trying to say is I would prefer to minimize the 
downside than take a chance on unlimited upside.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s just human nature to assume upside. We all think we have the &#8216;next big thing&#8217;, we all think it&#8217;s possible to win the lottery, we all think our kids are the next prodigy, etc, but when it comes to philanthropy I think it&#8217;s much smarter to go with the sure thing instead. Worst case scenario you&#8217;re helping somewhere that is truly needed, and best case scenario that &#8216;sure thing&#8217; becomes something that has much more upside than anticipated.  </p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m trying to say is I would prefer to minimize the<br />
downside than take a chance on unlimited upside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
