 |
The approach that GiveWell took from 2007-2011 had two crucial qualities: We have been passive. That is, we have focused on finding the best existing organizations and supporting them with no-strings-attached donations, rather than a more “active” approach of designing … [CLICK TO READ MORE]
We previously laid out our high-level priorities for 2012. The top two priorities are “make significant progress on GiveWell Labs” and “find more outstanding giving opportunities under the same basic framework as our existing recommendations.” This post elaborates on our … [CLICK TO READ MORE]
In previous posts, we discussed the progress we’ve made, where we stand, and how we can improve in core areas. This post focuses on the latter, and lays out our top-level strategic choices for the next year. The big picture … [CLICK TO READ MORE]
We’re still in the midst of publishing our annual review and plan to the blog (4 posts down, 2 to go). We’re planning to hold a conference call on Thursday, March 1 at 8pm EST to answer any questions people … [CLICK TO READ MORE]
This is the fourth post (of six) we’re planning to make focused on our self-evaluation and future plans. This post answers a set of critical questions for GiveWell stakeholders. The questions are the same as last year’s. Is GiveWell’s research … [CLICK TO READ MORE]
This is the third post (of six) we’re planning to make focused on our self-evaluation and future plans. This post answers a set of critical questions about the state of GiveWell as a donor resource. The questions are the same … [CLICK TO READ MORE]
