Quantcast ↓

The GiveWell Blog

Exploring how to get real change for your dollar.

  • Top Charities
    • #1: Against Malaria Foundation
    • #2: GiveDirectly
    • #3: Schistosomiasis Control Initiative
    • All Charities Considered
  • Research
    • Process
    • Criteria
    • Current priorities
    • Research FAQs
    • Conference Calls
    • Site Visits
    • Conversations
    • Issues
      • Disaster Relief
      • Microfinance
      • United States
      • Water
      • More
  • Credibility
    • Reputation
    • Transparency
    • Evaluations
    • Impact
  • Mistakes
  • Blog
  • About
    • About GiveWell
    • Get Involved
    • Progress To Date
    • Our Story
    • Our People
    • Jobs
    • Official Records
    • Donate To Us
    • Common Questions
    • Contact Us
    • For Charities

About Givewell

GiveWell finds outstanding giving opportunities and publishes the full details of the analysis to help donors decide where to give. More about GiveWell.

See our main site for charity reviews and recommendations.

  • Top charities
  • Giving 101

Recent Comments

  • Nick Beckstead on Flow-through effects
  • Holden on Flow-through effects
  • Toby Ord on Flow-through effects
  • Nick Beckstead on Flow-through effects
  • Nick Beckstead on Flow-through effects
  • Nick Beckstead on Flow-through effects
  • Nick Beckstead on Flow-through effects
  • Holden on GiveWell Labs update
  • Colin Rust on GiveWell Labs update
  • Holden on Unorthodox Prize
  • Colin Rust on Unorthodox Prize
  • Kris Zyp on Broad Market Efficiency
  • Holden on Broad Market Efficiency
  • Kris Zyp on Broad Market Efficiency
  • Holden on Broad Market Efficiency
  • Brian Tomasik on Broad Market Efficiency
  • Holden on Broad Market Efficiency
  • Brian Tomasik on Broad Market Efficiency
  • Holden on Broad Market Efficiency
  • Brian Tomasik on Broad Market Efficiency

The‌ GiveWell‌ Blog


Category Archives: US Education Charity

Post navigation

← Older posts

KIPP Houston has a 1.4 million dollar shortfall. How did this happen?

July 7, 2011
By Wendy

KIPP is one of the most well-known and, we believe, effective charities in the United States: it has a long track record of improving students’ performance in school and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has cited it as a model … [CLICK TO READ MORE]

Posted in KIPP, Room For More Funding, US Education Charity | 1 Reply

Chess in the Schools

November 13, 2009
By Holden

The New York Times recently profiled Chess in the Schools: The Chess-in-the-Schools program has sought to foster analytical skills on the theory that these will help students succeed academically. The group teaches 20,000 children a year and calculates that it … [CLICK TO READ MORE]

Posted in Asking the right questions, GiveWell Highlights, Impact evaluation, US Education Charity, Why good giving is hard | 3 Replies

Followup on Fryer/Dobbie study of “Harlem miracle”

May 18, 2009
By Holden

I recently posted about a new, intriguing study on the Harlem Children’s Zone. It’s now been a little over a week since David Brooks’s op-ed brought the study some major attention, and I’ve been keeping up with the reaction of … [CLICK TO READ MORE]

Posted in Asking the right questions, Impact evaluation, US Education Charity | 2 Replies

Two worlds

May 11, 2009
By Holden

Why are people so excited about one study of one charter school showing improved performance on math tests? (Our coverage of the study here). It’s because in academic circles, improving academic performance is seen as an extremely thorny problem with … [CLICK TO READ MORE]

Posted in GiveWell Highlights, GiveWell's Philosophy, US Education Charity | Leave a reply

Where I stand on education, my former favorite cause

May 8, 2009
By Holden

Education used to be my favorite cause. My enthusiasm waned as I saw both the cost-effectiveness of international aid and the apparent futility of education. (Elie’s 2007 post captures many of my thoughts.) The study that I’ve been blogging about … [CLICK TO READ MORE]

Posted in Harlem Children's Zone, International vs. US Charity, New vs. proven charities, US Education Charity | 3 Replies

Fryer and Dobbie on the Harlem Children’s Zone: significance

May 8, 2009
By Holden

My last post summarized a very recent paper by Fryer and Dobbie, finding large gains for charter school students in the Harlem Children’s Zone. (You can get the study here (PDF)). I believe that this paper is an unusually important … [CLICK TO READ MORE]

Posted in Harlem Children's Zone, US Education Charity | Leave a reply

Post navigation

← Older posts

Keep updated

  •  Blog posts (RSS 2)
  • Subscribe to the blog via email
  • Other ways to keep up with GiveWell

Recent Posts

  • Flow-through effects
  • Update on GiveWell’s web traffic / money moved: Q1 2013
  • Unorthodox Prize
  • Broad Market Efficiency
  • Ways to follow GiveWell
  • GiveWell Labs update
  • Challenges of Passive Funding
  • Is the world getting better?
  • GiveWell’s history of philanthropy/philanthropy journalism project
  • Deep value judgments and worldview characteristics
  • Why We Recommend So Few Charities
  • Trying (and failing) to find more funding gaps for delivering proven cost-effective interventions
  • Update on GiveWell’s Plans for 2013
  • GiveWell annual review for 2012: details on GiveWell’s money moved and web traffic
  • Why I didn’t give to the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative last year
  • External evaluation of our research
  • GiveWell’s plan for 2013: a top-level decision
  • GiveWell is hiring
  • Self-evaluation: GiveWell as a project
  • Self-evaluation: GiveWell as a donor resource

Full archive

  • All posts

Archives

  • May 2013 (5)
  • April 2013 (5)
  • March 2013 (6)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (3)
  • December 2012 (6)
  • November 2012 (5)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (6)
  • July 2012 (4)
  • June 2012 (3)
  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (7)
  • February 2012 (10)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (13)
  • November 2011 (4)
  • October 2011 (4)
  • September 2011 (4)
  • August 2011 (5)
  • July 2011 (6)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (6)
  • April 2011 (10)
  • March 2011 (5)
  • February 2011 (6)
  • January 2011 (6)
  • December 2010 (6)
  • November 2010 (4)
  • October 2010 (4)
  • September 2010 (5)
  • August 2010 (5)
  • July 2010 (7)
  • June 2010 (8)
  • May 2010 (6)
  • April 2010 (7)
  • March 2010 (11)
  • February 2010 (9)
  • January 2010 (9)
  • December 2009 (33)
  • November 2009 (26)
  • October 2009 (18)
  • September 2009 (5)
  • August 2009 (4)
  • July 2009 (5)
  • June 2009 (4)
  • May 2009 (15)
  • April 2009 (9)
  • March 2009 (8)
  • February 2009 (11)
  • January 2009 (5)
  • December 2008 (9)
  • November 2008 (8)
  • October 2008 (11)
  • September 2008 (12)
  • August 2008 (16)
  • July 2008 (11)
  • June 2008 (4)
  • May 2008 (5)
  • April 2008 (6)
  • March 2008 (5)
  • February 2008 (4)
  • January 2008 (4)
  • December 2007 (10)
  • November 2007 (12)
  • October 2007 (12)
  • September 2007 (19)
  • August 2007 (14)
  • July 2007 (15)
  • June 2007 (11)
  • May 2007 (9)
  • April 2007 (11)
  • March 2007 (14)
  • February 2007 (10)
  • January 2007 (16)
  • December 2006 (4)

Categories

  • (RED) Campaign (2)
  • Acumen Fund (2)
  • Against Malaria Foundation (9)
  • Agriculture Charity (6)
  • Antiretroviral Treatment (1)
  • Asking the right questions (14)
  • CARE (1)
  • Carter Center (6)
  • Cash transfer charity (12)
  • Cleft palate charity (3)
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (5)
  • Disability Adjusted Life-Years (4)
  • Disaster relief (17)
  • Donor illusion (13)
  • Evaluation of GiveWell (26)
  • Fistula charity (2)
  • Fungibility (2)
  • Gates Foundation (6)
  • GiveDirectly (8)
  • GiveWell Customers (3)
  • GiveWell Highlights (14)
  • GiveWell Labs (21)
  • GiveWell project (57)
  • GiveWell's criteria (4)
  • GiveWell's Philosophy (27)
  • Global Fund (1)
  • Grameen Foundation (4)
  • Guest posts from donors (5)
  • Haiti earthquake (3)
  • Harlem Children's Zone (4)
  • Heifer International (4)
  • High-performance vs. High-impact charity (2)
  • Hunger charity (1)
  • Impact evaluation (21)
  • International aid track record (3)
  • International charity (12)
  • International education charity (2)
  • International vs. US Charity (5)
  • Interplast (1)
  • KickStart (1)
  • KIPP (2)
  • Kiva (13)
  • Malaria Charity (4)
  • Microfinance charities (42)
  • Microsavings charity (2)
  • Millennium Villages (3)
  • New vs. proven charities (5)
  • Orphanages charity (1)
  • Overhead ratio (4)
  • Partners in Health (1)
  • Personal giving vs. Impact-based giving (5)
  • Peter Singer (1)
  • Problems with microfinance (17)
  • PSI (2)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
  • Relative standards of living (3)
  • Research Charity (1)
  • Responding to criticism (4)
  • Responsible investing (5)
  • Robin Hood Foundation (3)
  • Room For More Funding (14)
  • Schistosomiasis Control Initiative (9)
  • Site visits (7)
  • Smile Train (7)
  • Social enterprise investment (2)
  • Stop TB Partnership (3)
  • Toms Shoes (1)
  • Top charities (18)
  • Transparency (5)
  • Tuberculosis Charity (2)
  • Uncategorized (349)
  • UNICEF (4)
  • US Education Charity (12)
  • Vaccine charity (1)
  • VillageReach (14)
  • Why good giving is hard (7)
  • World Health Organization (1)
  • Worldwide Fistula Fund (2)

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
  • Home
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Get involved
  • RSS
  • Site map
  • Jobs
GiveWell, aka The Clear Fund (a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) public charity) 182 Howard Street #208, San Francisco, CA 94105
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
© 2013 - The GiveWell Blog

 

Clicky Web Analytics
↑