The GiveWell Blog

GiveWell’s progress in 2013

This is the first post (of six) we’re planning to make focused on our self-evaluation and future plans.

As in past years, we’re going to be posting our annual self-evaluation and plan as a series of blog posts. This post summarizes what changed for GiveWell in 2013 and what it means for the future. Future posts will elaborate.

This year, we are separately reviewing our “traditional work” (recommending top charities that focus on evidence-backed programs serving the global poor) and GiveWell Labs (our newer project, on which we work closely with Good Ventures).

For us, the major developments of 2013 were:

  • We continued to see strong growth in money moved and improved media coverage, though we are still working on assembling the details. There was some extent to which larger donors gave less in 2013 than previously, due to saving for future opportunities (potentially including AMF), so we aren’t yet sure what the final figures for larger donors will be, but the overall picture is one of strong growth.
  • We made major progress on building capacity. We made a total of 6 new hires, and these new hires led work on our new top charity review (more below) and on new reports on priority interventions. We also improved our donation processing system, further improving our forward-looking capacity. As a result, our 2014 plan for our traditional work is substantially more ambitious than our 2013 plan was.
  • We added a new top charity (Deworm the World Initiative) and produced substantial updates on our existing top charities, including suspending one recommendation for room-for-more-funding-related reasons.
  • We spent more senior staff time than anticipated on our traditional work (since there were major new developments concerning each of our top charities) as opposed to GiveWell Labs.
  • We made substantial progress on GiveWell Labs: we refined our basic framework and goals, gained some basic familiarity with two major areas of philanthropy (policy-oriented philanthropy and scientific research funding) that we had had little exposure to previously, and examined multiple potential causes at different levels of depth. We are setting a “stretch goal” for 2014 of making substantial commitments (multiple years, substantial funding) to causes within the broad areas of policy-oriented philanthropy and global catastrophic risks.
  • Our traditional work (“top charities”) seems both more challenging and more important than it was a year ago – the former because of how much senior time it continues to take to respond to new developments, the latter because of the increased media coverage and continuing growth in money moved that we saw. We now see a strong possibility that GiveWell Labs eventually will become a separate organization, though it will remain part of GiveWell in the short term. We plan minor steps to begin moving toward a separation, including potentially renaming GiveWell Labs.
  • Fundraising remains a priority. We are currently fundraising for unrestricted support, supporting a team that is allocated flexibly between GiveWell Labs and our more traditional work.

Overall, we consider 2013 to have been a year of substantial progress on research (both GiveWell Labs and our traditional work), staff capacity, and influence. Our 2014 goals will be more concrete and ambitious than our 2013 goals were.

Of course, we also made some mistakes in 2013, and we’ve recently updated our shortcomings log to reflect them. In particular, we produced public updates on AMF too infrequently.

A series of future posts will go into more detail on the above points.


  • Luke Muehlhauser on February 14, 2014 at 8:06 pm said:

    Congrats on all the hiring. That was very exciting to see.

  • Andrew Stuart on February 19, 2014 at 7:45 pm said:


    Through my workplace (one of the largest companies in Australia) I am salary sacrificing to charity through a program called Karma Currency.
    I can apply for new charities to be added to the Karma Currency service, however they must be tax deductible in Australia.
    My workplace also matches my donations.
    I would like to donate to AMF however they are not tax deductible.
    This means that on the same budget I could donate either $x to AMF externally or 2.66*$x to a tax registered charity through Karma Currency (including the matched giving depending on tax brackets etc).

    Karma Currency is more convenient therefore I am currently donating through it but to a charity you have not researched.
    I can imagine that there would be other people in my situation. Would you be possible to advertise the most efficient tax deductable charities on your website?
    Just a thought.


  • Alexander on February 26, 2014 at 1:23 pm said:

    Andrew – thanks for the suggestion. AMF has tried a number of times to achieve tax deductibility in Australia, but our understanding is that Australia’s process is unusually difficult, and we do not have a sense of whether they will eventually succeed. We don’t think our audience in Australia is large enough at this point for us to focus on identifying a top charity that is tax-deductible in Australia. Sorry not to be more helpful with this.

  • Hi, Just feedback from another Australian to say that I just searched your website for an Australian registered charity. If you had the capacity some Australian research would be very valuable. Thanks.

  • Jon B on March 14, 2014 at 5:21 pm said:

    Hi Jon and Andrew,

    I work with The Life You Can Save. We publish a list of recommended charities which includes all of GiveWell’s recommendations as well as AMF. Our list also includes two charities that are tax-deductible in Australia: Oxfam and the Fred Hollows Foundation. You can find our research on these organizations here:

    Donors looking for effective tax-deductible giving options in other locations can check here for more information:

    Hope this helps!


  • Andrew Stuart on March 19, 2014 at 7:23 pm said:

    Thank-you Jon B.

Comments are closed.