This year, we are focused on two primary goals. The first is to rapidly scale our research capabilities so we’re able to move much more donor funding to highly cost-effective programs in the near future. The second is to find and fund as many of the best opportunities we can this year to save and improve lives.
In 2025, we committed $418 million in grants. Though we’re just halfway through the year, we’ve already committed over $400 million in 2026. We anticipate our total grantmaking is likely to approach or even exceed $1 billion this year, and we are working toward a future that could be several times that scale.
We’re excited to share another major step in that direction. Coefficient Giving has decided to increase its near-term funding commitment for GiveWell grants to $1 billion in support of our continued scaling.
This commitment is both extraordinary and timely. Near-term needs continue to far surpass our fundraising expectations, and we are actively working to raise more funds to support a growing set of cost-effective opportunities to help people in need.
What’s driving our increased grantmaking
Several factors have driven our current expansion, as well as our ability to continue scaling.
Team growth
We have been growing rapidly over the past two years, going from 38 research team members to 79, and we’re continuing to hire. With this growth, we’ve been able to evaluate more funding opportunities and continue expanding our search for a wider set of cost-effective programs to fund.
For example: One of the ways we’re uncovering new, cost-effective ways to save and improve lives beyond our traditional grantmaking portfolio is through our growing New Areas research subteam, which investigates programs in cause areas GiveWell hasn’t historically focused on, such as access to medical oxygen or stockouts of essential medicines at health facilities.
Learn more: Listen to a conversation with the lead researcher on our New Areas subteam.
More experience
We’re also seeing the benefits of an experienced bench of researchers, whose knowledge and relationships are combining to enable GiveWell to find outstanding opportunities and direct funding to them faster.
For example: With a dedicated vaccination team, we’re now able to move beyond just funding specific evidence-backed programs and instead address a bigger question: What are the underlying problems that prevent children from being vaccinated and what can we do about them?
Learn more: Listen to a conversation with the lead researcher on our Vaccines subteam
Larger grants
Our researchers are explicitly searching for bigger opportunities than we’ve had the resources to investigate and to fund in the past.
For example: This is true across many of the research subteams, including the malaria team, which expects to direct nearly three times as much funding this year as last year to highly cost-effective programs. To support this continued growth, they are funding studies to improve future grantmaking decisions, looking for ways to increase coverage of insecticide-treated nets and seasonal malaria chemoprevention, and seeking to expand our portfolio of programs.
Learn more: Read about how this team is improving and expanding its work
Responding to cuts in foreign aid
In 2025, we responded to urgent needs that arose from substantial disruptions to global health funding. This year, we have been monitoring foreign aid funding to maintain a clear picture of where it has been renewed, where it has been discontinued, and where cost-effective gaps are emerging so that we can help people in need as much as we can.
For example: Around $50 million of our grantmaking so far in 2026 directly addresses urgent needs created by cuts to foreign aid, including funding gaps for family planning, HIV treatment, and malaria prevention, though many of the other programs we fund are being affected by the cuts in some way.
Learn more: Read a recap of our 2025 response for foreign aid cuts
Lowering our cost-effectiveness threshold
We maintain a cost-effectiveness threshold at a level where we expect to be able to fully fund all the opportunities we find above it. As our funding projections increase, we are able to lower the threshold and fund more great opportunities than we otherwise could.
For example: Earlier this year, we lowered our threshold from 8 times our benchmark to 6 times. While most of our cost-effectiveness estimates for the programs we fund sit well above this, this shift is allowing us to deploy funding more quickly to an expanded set of opportunities. We estimate this may result in around $90 million in grants this year that we might not otherwise have made.
Learn more: Explore a table that lists all our grants
Our need for more funding
Coefficient Giving’s commitment comes at a particularly important time for two reasons. First, the needs remain enormous. More than four million young children die in low- and middle-income countries every year1Our World in Data, “Number of child deaths,” 2024, shows 2.73 million deaths of children under five in low-income countries and 1.60 million in lower-middle-income countries, totaling 4.33 million in 2024.—and most of those deaths are preventable.2World Bank Group, “Mortality rate, under-5 (per 1,000 live births)” shows a mortality rate for children under five of 40.8 for low- and middle-income countries and a child mortality rate of 5.1 for high-income countries in 2024. If children under five in low- and middle-income countries were to die at the child mortality rate of high-income countries rather than at their current rate, representing the potential effect of high-income country conditions existing across low- and middle-income countries, 87.5% of child deaths in low- and middle-income countries would be averted: 5.1 / 40.8 = 12.5%, or 1 − 0.125 = 87.5% percent averted. Support from our donors has helped us make progress, but so much more remains to be done.
Second, we believe that there will be substantial new philanthropic resources in the coming years, and we want to be in a position to help donors save and improve lives as much as we can. This means we have a lot of work to do so our team, grantees, and other partners, such as country health systems, are ready.
The needs and opportunities before us far exceed our current resources. Our growing team is investigating promising programs at a scale we haven’t previously been able to pursue—and we continue to invite donors to help us meet them.
We’re not looking to grow just because there may be more money available or because a bigger GiveWell is necessarily better. We’re doing this because we believe GiveWell can direct much more funding to where it will have exceptional impact, and we will tell you if we reach a funding level where we think there are more effective options.
We’re grateful for this commitment from Coefficient Giving—and for the trust and generosity of all our donors who are helping us work toward even greater impact.
Notes
| ↑1 | Our World in Data, “Number of child deaths,” 2024, shows 2.73 million deaths of children under five in low-income countries and 1.60 million in lower-middle-income countries, totaling 4.33 million in 2024. |
|---|---|
| ↑2 | World Bank Group, “Mortality rate, under-5 (per 1,000 live births)” shows a mortality rate for children under five of 40.8 for low- and middle-income countries and a child mortality rate of 5.1 for high-income countries in 2024. If children under five in low- and middle-income countries were to die at the child mortality rate of high-income countries rather than at their current rate, representing the potential effect of high-income country conditions existing across low- and middle-income countries, 87.5% of child deaths in low- and middle-income countries would be averted: 5.1 / 40.8 = 12.5%, or 1 − 0.125 = 87.5% percent averted. |