This post gives an overall update on progress and plans for the Open Philanthropy Project. Our last update was about six months ago, and the primary goals it laid out were six-month goals.
Summary:
- U.S. policy (previous update): we have prioritized hiring and are ahead of the goal we set. We made a full-time hire for criminal justice reform and, more recently, made another hire (pending finalization of a work visa) for a program officer role focused on the treatment of animals in industrial agriculture. Going forward, our priorities will be (1) working with new hires; (2) looking for giving opportunities in immigration policy and land use reform; and (3) either hiring or grantmaking in macroeconomic policy. More
- Global catastrophic risks (previous update): progress has been in line with our goals in some ways and not in others (details below). When the opportunity arose to help support the Future of Life Institute’s work on mitigating potential risks from advanced artificial intelligence, we decided to prioritize it. We ended up spending a large amount of time investigating this opportunity and recommending a grant of ~$1.2 million. Since then, we have raised the priority of this cause. Our top priorities going forward will be further investigating the cause of potential risks from advanced artificial intelligence, considering a full-time hire for it, and continuing our search for a full-time biosecurity hire. We hope to resolve both within the next six months. More
- Scientific research (previous update): we did not have a six-month goal, but we are very unlikely to accomplish the goals we set for the year. Our priority is building scientific advisory capacity, via our ongoing search and our current part-time arrangement with Lily Kim (who is now working 20 hours per week, up from 5 previously). More
- Public content: we are hoping to launch a separate website for the Open Philanthropy Project by the end of the calendar year. We have many public writeups still in progress, though we have completed writeups for the highest-priority causes. More
The overall theme is that we are putting most of our effort into capacity building (recruiting, trial hires, onboarding new hires). This is in contrast to six months ago, when most of our effort went into selecting focus areas. Six months from now, we hope to be putting most of our effort into recommending grants and putting out public content. (Specifically, we hope that our efforts within the “U.S. policy” and “global catastrophic risks” categories will fit this description. We expect it to take longer to choose focus areas within scientific research.)